ISSUE 02FRIDAY, JUNE 5, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / RL-ACD-REINFORCEMENT-LEARNING-BASED-APPROXIMATE-CONVEX-DECOMPOSITION-2025-000776
No code

RL-ACD: Reinforcement Learning-based Approximate Convex Decomposition

2025 / ACM Transactions on Graphics / DOI 10.1145/3763270

Approximate Convex Decomposition (ACD) aims to approximate complex 3D shapes with convex components, which is widely applied to create compact collision representations for real-time applications, including VR/AR, interactive games, and robotic simulations. Efficiency and optimality are critical for ACD algorithms in approximating large-scale, complex 3D shapes, enabling high-quality decompositions with minimal components. Unfortunately, existing methods either employ sub-optimal greedy strategies or rely on computationally intensive multi-step searches. In this work, we propose RL-ACD, a data-driven, reinforcement learning-based approach for efficient and near-optimal convex shape decomposition. We formulate ACD as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), where cutting planes are iteratively applied based on the current stage's mesh fragments rather than the entire fine-grained mesh, leading to a novel, efficient geometric encoding. To train near-optimal policies for ACD, we propose a novel dual-state Bellman loss and analyze its convergence using a Q-learning algorithm. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse datasets validate the efficiency and accuracy of RL-ACD for convex decomposition tasks. Our method outperforms the multi-step tree search by 15× in terms of computational speed, while reducing the number of resulting components by 16% compared to the current state-of-the-art greedy algorithms, significantly narrowing the sub-optimality gap and enhancing downstream task performance.

0
Citations
15
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Lineage not indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but no in-corpus reference or citing-paper links have been attached yet.