ISSUE 02WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / MOVER-MOTION-VERIFICATION-FOR-MOTION-GRAPHICS-ANIMATIONS-2025-762655
No code

MoVer: Motion Verification for Motion Graphics Animations

2025 / ACM Transactions on Graphics / DOI 10.1145/3731209

While large vision-language models can generate motion graphics animations from text prompts, they regularly fail to include all spatio-temporal properties described in the prompt. We introduce MoVer, a motion verification DSL based on first-order logic that can check spatio-temporal properties of a motion graphics animation. We identify a general set of such properties that people commonly use to describe animations (e.g., the direction and timing of motions, the relative positioning of objects, etc.). We implement these properties as predicates in MoVer and provide an execution engine that can apply a MoVer program to any input SVG-based motion graphics animation. We then demonstrate how MoVer can be used in an LLM-based synthesis and verification pipeline for iteratively refining motion graphics animations. Given a text prompt, our pipeline synthesizes a motion graphics animation and a corresponding MoVer program. Executing the verification program on the animation yields a report of the predicates that failed and the report can be automatically fed back to LLM to iteratively correct the animation. To evaluate our pipeline, we build a synthetic dataset of 5600 text prompts paired with ground truth MoVer verification programs. We find that while our LLM-based pipeline is able to automatically generate a correct motion graphics animation for 58.8% of the test prompts without any iteration, this number raises to 93.6% with up to 50 correction iterations. Our code and dataset are at https://mover-dsl.github.io.

3
Citations
25
References
0
Implementations
Reusable
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

ReusableConfidence: editor verified / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

2
Evidence
2
Verified
yes
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Lineage not indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but no in-corpus reference or citing-paper links have been attached yet.