ISSUE 02THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / COMPUTATIONAL-CONCEPTUAL-DESIGN-TYPOLOGICAL-EXPLORATION-OF-SPATIAL-TRUSS-SYSTEMS-2023-523579
No code

Computational Conceptual Design – Typological Exploration Of Spatial Truss Systems Through Optimization

2023 / Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures / DOI 10.20898/j.iass.2023.026

Exploring a wide range of relevant design options from the outset is crucial for every sound conceptual design process. Optimization techniques are generally employed to generate well-performing structural design options. However, focusing only on performative criteria may narrow the design brief too early and neglect essential aspects beyond pure performance. In response, this paper introduces a new method for generating structural forms that emphasizes both performance and structural diversity. Applying mixed integer linear programming onto strut- and-tie models, the method employs layout optimization in a new way by (1) generating and modifying custom ground structures and (2) using them to produce systems in static equilibrium that optimize user-balanced sets of custom goals. While the first feature forces a broad exploration of the solution space, the second ensures the generation of only close-to-optimal solutions. Combined, both features provide a new means for generating a trans-topological set of diverse and well-performing designs. The applicability of the method is demonstrated through several case studies. Results show that our formulations allow for the real-time generation of multiple design options, including well-known and uncommon, but no less valid, typologies. Using this approach, designers can move beyond the limitations of established typologies and explore a new variety of structural forms.

3
Citations
13
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Selected paper
Computational Conceptual Design – Typological Exploration...
2023 / 3 citations
Cited by0