ISSUE 02WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / A-SYSTEMATIC-REVIEW-AND-ANALYSIS-OF-THE-VIABILITY-OF-3D-PRINTED-CONSTRUCTION-IN--2021-588208
No code

A systematic review and analysis of the viability of 3D-printed construction in remote environments

2021 / Automation in Construction / DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103642

3D-printed construction is an additive, layer-by-layer construction method with the potential to reduce material consumption, optimize design, decrease construction time, lower labor requirements, minimize logistical demand, improve sustainability, and reduce costs as compared to conventional construction. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of 4491 publications spanning from 1998 through 2019. The review presents the viability of 3D-printed construction as a replacement for conventional construction methods, specifically in remote, isolated, or expeditionary environments, where conventional construction capability may be limited. The paper includes an analysis and characterization of the existing body of 3D-printed construction literature before evaluating seven viability factors of the method: materials, structural design, process efficiency, logistics, labor, environmental impact, and cost. In addition, the paper highlights three case studies of 3D-printed construction in remote, isolated, and expeditionary environments. The paper concludes by suggesting areas of future research to ensure the viability of this technology, such as printing full-scale structures and components with locally sourced materials in uncontrolled environments, defining standards for 3D printing, automating additional construction processes, and performing both environmental impact and cost life-cycle analyses. With continued investment in research and development, 3D printing could become a more viable and accepted method of construction, transforming the way the industry is managed in remote, isolated, and expeditionary environments.

142
Citations
230
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

References0
Selected paper
A systematic review and analysis of the viability of 3D-p...
2021 / 142 citations